Share this
African Nations Involved in the Slave Trade
The slave trade was the horrific trafficking of Africans as enslaved persons to the Americas, Europe, and the Middle East. It was a catastrophe of violence, extraction, and human degradation—driven above all by external demand and imperial systems, but also, tragically, involving some African states and networks.
The key truth: some African states took part in slave trading, but Africa as a whole did not. Out of roughly 2,000 African ethnicities, evidence links around 30 population groups to slave trading, while 1,970 are not tied to it in the evidence cited here.
Between 1500 AD and 1890 AD, more than 22,000,000 Africans were sold into slavery according to R. A. Austen (1979). Around 6,856,000 were sold east: 3,956,000 across the Sahara and 2,900,000 across the Red Sea and Indian Ocean. Around 15,000,000 were trafficked across the Atlantic. According to the British National Archives, 70% of all Africans sold into slavery in the Americas were transported by Portugal and Britain.
Important context: this history must not be weaponised by the far-right or by racial propagandists. The existence of some African participation does not dilute European, Ottoman, Arab, or wider imperial responsibility, and it does not justify collective blame against Africans. Human exploitation has appeared in many regions of the world. What matters here is accuracy, scale, and moral clarity.
Scroll down for the case studies, context, safeguards against misuse, and sources ↓
This history demands precision, not propaganda
The easiest way to lie with history is to take a true detail and strip it of scale, proportion, and structure. Yes, some African states and elites participated in slave trading. But that fact sits inside a much larger system driven by massive outside demand, maritime power, commercial finance, and imperial transport networks controlled overwhelmingly beyond Africa.
It is also crucial to distinguish between some states and all Africans. The same continent that contained polities implicated in slaving also contained thousands of communities that were raided, sold, displaced, brutalised, and permanently damaged by those systems. The victims were overwhelmingly African. The extraction of human beings from African societies weakened families, institutions, political stability, and long-term development.
Good history resists two temptations at once: it refuses romantic denial, and it refuses racialised abuse masquerading as honesty.
Ten precolonial states or regimes discussed in the record
The examples below come from the text you provided and have been arranged for clarity. They do not represent Africa as a whole. They represent documented cases within a much larger and more painful history.
1. Dahomey
The Kingdom of Dahomey was a West African kingdom located in present-day Benin. It became a major source of enslaved persons for the Atlantic slave trade, raiding nearby settlements for captives. In the 1720s, King Agaja expanded Dahomey by taking over Allada in 1724 and Whydah in 1727, giving Dahomey control over key coastal slave ports such as Porto Novo and Ouidah.
With those coastal cities in its hands, Dahomey became known as a major market for slave exports and profited heavily from the trade. It raised slave prices, which attracted the attention of the more powerful Oyo Empire. Dahomey was defeated in the 1740s and became tributary to Oyo for roughly 100 years. Its participation in the Atlantic trade continued until 1852, when Britain—having long been one of the major customers of that very trade—forced Dahomey to end it.
The monarchy’s dependence on the trade appears starkly in a reported statement by King Gezo in the 1840s:
“The slave trade is the ruling principle of my people. It is the source and the glory of their wealth…the mother lulls the child to sleep with notes of triumph over an enemy reduced to slavery…”
2. Morocco
The Alawite Dynasty in Morocco took part in the Trans-Saharan slave trade. Major slave markets existed in Tangiers, Marrakesh, and Fez, where enslaved people were sold openly. During expansion wars, the Alawite state captured Africans and sold many of them into wider Middle Eastern slave systems. Morocco also functioned as a major centre of the Arab slave trade. Research published in the book Black Morocco by academic Chouki El Hamel suggests the trade finally ended in 1950.
The legal framework under Islamic law differed from the slavery systems that developed in the Americas. Slave women who bore children to their masters could gain freedom with their children, and those children could inherit property and receive education. That meant some sultans, judges, and prominent officials had slave ancestry. This was very different from the perpetual hereditary slavery that hardened in North America, where the son of a free man and an enslaved woman could remain enslaved.
Morocco also sourced captives from Europe through the activities of Barbary corsairs, who captured and enslaved Europeans including Spaniards, Frenchmen, Dutchmen, Greeks, Portuguese, Italians, Irish, Scandinavians, Russians, Georgians, and others travelling in inadequately armed ships. The largest group of Europeans enslaved by Moroccans were the Spanish.
3. Ottoman Algeria
The Regency of Algiers, which existed from 1518 to 1830 as part of the Ottoman Empire, was a major player in slave trading. According to published research, it enslaved both Africans and Europeans, often in connection with the activities of Barbary pirates. Large slave markets operated in the region, with captives sold through Trans-Saharan routes as well as obtained through raiding, warfare, and trade.
The system lasted until 1830, when conflict with France contributed to the end of Ottoman rule in Algeria.
4. Egypt
Egypt was a major player in the Trans-Saharan and later wider slave trade systems. The text dates a key turning point to 641 AD, with the Muslim conquest of Egypt by the Rashidun Caliphate, after which trade routes linking Egypt to Mecca and the Middle East became more firmly established.
Later, Egypt became part of the Ottoman Empire in the 1500s. Millions of enslaved persons were taken from Egypt to Asia and that the trade ended in the 1900s after British pressure intensified when Egypt defaulted on its debts. Because of its long history in these systems, Egypt is included here as one of the African polities deeply implicated in slave trading routes.
5. Kanem-Bornu
The Kanem Bornu Empire, based across parts of present-day Cameroon, Chad, and Nigeria, lasted from around 700 to 1900 AD. By around 900 AD, enslaved persons had become a principal commodity, and by the end of the 15th century roughly 5,000 slaves were traded annually according to research.
Initially, enslaved people were sold through the Trans-Saharan trade. Later, the empire also became implicated in the Transatlantic trade. Around two million slaves walked through the slave route in their empire. Kanem Bornu raided non-Muslim neighbouring kingdoms for captives, especially in times of economic need. Eventually, the empire itself was invaded, and its role in the trade ended.
6. Kingdom of Allada
The Kingdom of Allada, located in southern Benin, reached the peak of its power in the 16th century and became a centre of the Atlantic slave trade. It supplied captives through raids and attacks on neighbouring polities, then sold them onward to European slave traders bound for the Americas.
As a coastal kingdom, Allada controlled a major Atlantic slave port. Even after the kingdom itself declined, the coast remained significant in the wider trade. In 1724, Dahomey invaded Allada, and many of Allada’s own people were then sold into slavery—an especially grim reminder that systems of predation can consume those who participate in them.
7. Aro Confederacy
The Aro Confederacy was a political union in present-day south-eastern Nigeria. According published research, the Aro were among the leading exporters of slaves to Europe and the Americas from 1690 to 1902, with estimates suggesting around 850,000 slaves were exported overseas.
Once the Aro gained the upper hand in the slave trade, they launched wars and raids to capture more captives. The confederacy drew cohesion from the Chukwu oracle of Aro, which helped unify the region into a large trading network. This made the Aro an especially important case in the history of internal West African slave-trading structures linked to Atlantic demand.
8. Ashanti Empire
The Ashanti Empire, based in present-day Ghana, was formed in 1700 and participated in the slave trade until the 19th century. According to research, its economy rested heavily on the trade in gold and slaves.
Its army often functioned as an instrument for capturing people in war. Those captives could be kept within the empire as enslaved labourers or exported across the Atlantic to the Americas. The Ashanti case therefore sits within the broader history of states that combined warfare, commerce, and human trafficking in ways shaped by Atlantic demand.
9. Songhai Empire
The Songhai Empire, one of the largest states in African history, was based in western Africa. Slave trading formed a substantial part of the empire’s economy. According to published research, slaves were used internally to transport goods, and literate enslaved people could sometimes rise to administrative roles, though many were also exported in the Transatlantic trade through European buyers.
Captives were often procured through raids and wars with neighbouring peoples, especially the Kru and Baga. Songhai therefore illustrates how internal and external uses of slavery could exist side by side inside a major precolonial state.
10. Mali Empire
The Mali Empire, based in present-day Mali from roughly 1235 to 1670 AD, was deeply engaged in trade—including trade in enslaved people through the Trans-Saharan route. Slave labour was common, and captives were also exported. According to research, thousands were enslaved in raids and wars waged by the empire over time.
Slavery was later abolished under French colonial rule, though forms of descent-based slavery have persisted in parts of northern Mali. This reminds us that the afterlives of slavery are often stubborn and do not disappear the moment the law changes.
How to stop this history being abused by the far-right
There is a predictable bad-faith move that appears whenever this subject is raised: someone points to African participation and tries to use it to excuse, flatten, or racialise the wider history of slavery. That move fails on several levels.
Scale matters
The Transatlantic slave trade operated on a scale that depended heavily on European shipping, European finance, European legal systems, and European plantation demand. The National Archives figure that Portugal and Britain transported 70% of all Africans sold into slavery in the Americas—is not a decorative footnote. It is structural.
Most Africans were victims, not perpetrators
Evidence links around 30 population groups out of 2,000 African ethnicities to slave trading. That means the overwhelming majority are not implicated by that evidence base and should not be collectively blamed.
Slavery was global, but not identical
Many societies in world history practiced forms of slavery. That does not erase the distinct brutality, racialisation, hereditary structure, and Atlantic-industrial scale of the slavery system built in the Americas.
Moral honesty is not racial propaganda
The mature response is to tell the truth in full: some African states participated; European, Arab, Ottoman, and wider imperial systems drove enormous demand; and African societies suffered catastrophic damage. Precision is the antidote to propaganda.
The right lesson is not “Africans did it to themselves.” The right lesson is that exploitative systems often recruit local intermediaries while remaining driven by larger structures of demand and power.
This history is tragic, complicated, and morally serious
The slave trade was a horrific system that exploited the people of Africa for personal and material gain. It is deeply sad that some African states took part in that exploitation. Their participation should be neither denied nor exaggerated beyond proportion. Historical honesty demands something more demanding than that: proportion, context, and moral seriousness.
The stain of slavery set Africa back in devastating ways. It damaged communities, weakened institutions, and tore millions of people away from their societies. But accuracy also requires us to remember that Africa was not simply the location of this crime. Africans were its principal victims.
The task is not to simplify the past until it flatters someone. The task is to tell it truthfully enough that it can no longer be abused.
Myth of No Civilisations
The slave trade did immense damage—but Africa’s story is far older, wider, and richer than the catastrophe imposed on it.
Myth of No Civilisations restores the deeper civilisational record too often erased by shallow narratives. It examines more than 320,000 years of African history, showing that the continent was never a blank backdrop waiting for outside actors to make it historically relevant.
- Rebuilds the deeper history that slavery and colonial narratives often obscure.
- Explains African governance, trade systems, law, medicine, education, and intellectual traditions.
- Gives readers the wider framework needed to resist both denial and racist misuse.
- Helps place traumatic history inside a truthful and much larger African timeline.
Questions readers may ask
Tap a question to expand the answer.
Did some African states participate in the slave trade?
Yes. Some African states and networks participated in slave trading, especially in response to larger external demand. But that is very different from saying Africa as a whole was responsible.
Does African participation reduce European responsibility?
No. European empires, merchants, shipping systems, plantation economies, and legal structures were central to the scale and operation of the Transatlantic trade. Local participation does not erase system-level responsibility.
How many Africans were trafficked according to the figures in this article?
More than 22,000,000 Africans were sold into slavery between 1500 AD and 1890 AD, including roughly 15,000,000 across the Atlantic and 6,856,000 eastward across Saharan, Red Sea, and Indian Ocean routes.
Can this history be used to say “Africans sold themselves”?
No. That phrase is historically sloppy and morally manipulative. It erases the scale of outside demand, collapses a vast continent into a few implicated states, and ignores that Africans were the overwhelming victims of the trade.
Why include this history at all if it can be misused?
Because honest history matters. The answer to misuse is not concealment. It is context, proportion, and precision. Bad-faith actors thrive on simplification; good history removes that oxygen.
References cited in the text
- Law, Robin. “Dahomey and the Slave Trade: Reflections on the Historiography of the Rise of Dahomey.” The Journal of African History, vol. 27, no. 2, 1986, pp. 237–267. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/181135. Accessed 12 Mar. 2021.
- John Wright (2002) Morocco: the last great slave market?, The Journal of North African Studies, 7:3, 53-66, DOI: 10.1080/13629380208718473
- Reed P.P. (2009) Algerians, Renegades, and Transnational Rogues in Slaves in Algiers. In: Rogue Performances. Palgrave Studies in Theatre and Performance History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622715_3
- Arsenault, Natalie and Rose, Christopher. “Africa Enslaved: A Curriculum Unit on Comparative Slave Systems for Grades 9-12” Available Online. Accessed 12 Mar. 2021.
- Smith, Abdullahi (1972). Ajayi, J.F. Ade; Crowder, Michael (eds.). The early states of the Central Sudan, in History of West Africa, Volume One. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 168–172, 199–201. ISBN 0231036280.
- Law, Robin. “The Slave Trade in Seventeenth-Century Allada: A Revision.” African Economic History, no. 22, 1994, pp. 59–92. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/3601668. Accessed 12 Mar. 2021.
- Oriji, J.N. “THE SLAVE TRADE, WARFARE AND ARO EXPANSION IN THE IGBO HINTERLAND.” Transafrican Journal of History, vol. 16, 1987, pp. 151–166. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24328626. Accessed 12 Mar. 2021.
- Green, Toby. A fistful of shells : West Africa from the rise of the slave trade to the age of revolution (Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle-Version ed.). London. p. 108, 247. ISBN 978-0-241-00328-2.
- David C. Conrad (2009). Empires of Medieval West Africa.
- Eric Hahonou & Lotte Pelckmans. West African Anti-Slavery Movements: Citizenship Struggles and the legacies of slavery. Stichproben. Wiener Zeitschrift für kritische Afrikastudien Nr. 20/2011, 11. Jg., 141‐162. Available online
